Michael Van Canneyt escreveu:
I agree that the contents/content properties should be reduced to 1
property. But this is a change which will break backwards
compatibility.
AFAIK the fpWeb interface is still in progress. Anyway, better
change now than later.
The question is: which one ?
Contents is more versatile and does not lead to performance pitfalls
like using it as a simple AnsiString property
So you prefer Contents ?
Yes. In fact in the patch i sent i already removed Content.
OK. BTW what's the intention of adding TWebHandler AFAIK only add
another layer.
There is a simple reason: if you want to have a service application,
there
will be 2 application objects. Now you can have only 1 application
object
(service application) which uses the webhandler to process requests.
You can now also produce 1 binary which can be configured to run as a
CGI/FCGI/Service/standalone server, and which will have 1 single
application
instance for all 4 cases.
Good.
Do you have an simple example of such program?
Not yet for public use.
I personally need the case of a fastcgi service application, for use
with ExternalFastCGIServer of mod_fastcgi.
(*not* mod_fcgid, it has no such equivalent)
But I will try to cook up an application which does that.
Thanks. I'll be waiting.
Luiz
_______________________________________________
fpc-devel maillist - fpc-devel@lists.freepascal.org
http://lists.freepascal.org/mailman/listinfo/fpc-devel
