Am 09.09.2010 16:37, schrieb Marco van de Voort: > In our previous episode, Florian Klaempfl said: >>> I don't see any connection why the situation with packages would be any >>> different, licensewise, from the current situation with EXEs. >>> >>> ... Most notably since a EXE+packages is essentially just an EXE fragmented >>> over multiple parts. >> >> E.g. for a closed source IDE packages are essentially. > > Then you touch the Lazarus license (GPL), still not FPC's. > > Moreover, I already said I don't think binary design packages (proprietary > or not) are very practical for Lazarus.
Not Lazarus but just some hypothetical 3rd party IDE. _______________________________________________ fpc-devel maillist - fpc-devel@lists.freepascal.org http://lists.freepascal.org/mailman/listinfo/fpc-devel