Am 19.10.2010 10:31, schrieb Florian Klaempfl:
Am 19.10.2010 10:20, schrieb Sven Barth:
Am 19.10.2010 10:12, schrieb Florian Klaempfl:
Am 19.10.2010 09:32, schrieb Graeme Geldenhuys:
Op 2010-10-19 08:59, Paul Ishenin het geskryf:
The most wanted feature is "Unicode string support".
What Hans-Peter meant is that even if he does implement Unicode String
support, that would require changes in the compiler. Florian apparently
doesn't like any changes to the compiler,
When did I say this? What I said was: I won't merge changes into trunk
which implement support for alternative parsers (this is the topic of
this thread!) because nobody could explain me yet the use of alternative
parsers for FPC users. So I would spend time in something with no gain
for users resulting in even less time for other problems. Maybe somebody
else will merge it, but he takes the burden to fix any regressions and
maintain the changed code.
To be honest (as someone who hasn't yet posted to this topic): You
sounded very much like "we don't want to merge this" with "we" as in
"the core devs".
When did I write "we"? I think my initial statement was pretty clear:
http://lists.freepascal.org/lists/fpc-devel/2010-October/022335.html
Yes, you didn't write "we". But it came along as such.
That might be, because you - as the initial developer of FPC - are more
or less the leader of this project and as such an "I" from you is often
perceived as a "we", although you might not mean it in that way. That's
a psychological problem ^^
Regards,
Sven
_______________________________________________
fpc-devel maillist - fpc-devel@lists.freepascal.org
http://lists.freepascal.org/mailman/listinfo/fpc-devel
