Quoting Mattias Gaertner <[email protected]>:
On Tue, 26 Oct 2010 17:31:48 +0200
zeljko <[email protected]> wrote:
On Tuesday 26 October 2010 16:57, Sergei Gorelkin wrote:
>
> Well, maybe. For me, it is rather hard to think about the
opposite - that a
> const may be passed *not* by reference - due to long-term Delphi/Windows
> experience.
>
> But, after all, Types.IntersectRect and surrounding stuff were introduced
> and are intended as WinApi replacement, and WinApi IntersectRect() *does*
> pass params by reference (they are originally PRect). So maybe it will be
> still good to fix Types.IntersectRect to conform?
One note: IntersectRect in lazarus worked OK until we decided to use
Types.IntersectRect, old implementation from GraphType looks much
better than
current fpc one.
Then it is probably better to undo the change.
Should I do that?
No, why ? I've fixed problems inside widgetsets.Let's propose patch
for improving Types.IntersectRect().
zeljko
_______________________________________________
fpc-devel maillist - [email protected]
http://lists.freepascal.org/mailman/listinfo/fpc-devel
