Am 13.03.2011 16:40, schrieb Florian Klämpfl:
Am 13.03.2011 11:26, schrieb Sven Barth:
I'd like to know how I should proceed
regarding these (and possible also the first two, as they might take
their time as well ^^ ).
Implement things as those were fixed.
Do you mean "as if those were fixed"?
As I don't think it's a good idea to put the handling in TSymtableStack
itself I basically have the following solutions left:
* add events that are triggered on push/pop to TSymtableStack
* make push/pop virtual methods and subclass TSymtableStack
In the first case I might need to introduce a "factory function" that
creates an TSymtableStack and sets up the two events. In the second case
we need to agree that all symtablestacks (maybe except the stacks for
macros) must now be created as the new subclass.
Hmm... rereading what I wrote above I personally would go for the second
solution.
I'am not a big fan of eventing in the compiler: event based designs are
fine for libraries, but for the compiler typically not needed.
That's why I asked. So the second solution then?
Regards,
Sven
_______________________________________________
fpc-devel maillist - fpc-devel@lists.freepascal.org
http://lists.freepascal.org/mailman/listinfo/fpc-devel
