> >>> On top of what I already wrote on mantis. I believe my initial idea can >>> be further simplified. >>> >>> Given: procedure Foo(const s1, s2: string); >> >> What about records, arrays etc. containing ref. counted types? > > This case is shlighly different. >(...)
I suppose Florian already knows that, he just meant it's basically the same programming/coding error. And also guess he meant "where do we stop"? ;-) Maybe just adding the option to disable the const optimization and letting the programmer figure out whether it fixes or not a bug is a good enough addition? Best regards, Flávio _______________________________________________ fpc-devel maillist - fpc-devel@lists.freepascal.org http://lists.freepascal.org/mailman/listinfo/fpc-devel
