On 08/29/2011 11:08 AM, Sven Barth wrote:
But there is a significant difference between the JVM bytecode and the
Dalvik one and perhaps Michael thought of that when writing his question:
The JVM bytecode is a pure stackbased one while the Dalvik one uses
registers.
Yep.
That is why I am astonished that converting Java-Bytecode to Dalvik code
should be an easy task.
I do know a stack based 32-Bit Hardware engine using such a byte code
("ZPU") Same is done to use as little FPGA resources as possible. It do
know that a GNU C compiler for this engine exists. Using it's Assembler
is highly depreciated, as watching the stack locations is close to
impossible for humans.
-Michael
_______________________________________________
fpc-devel maillist - [email protected]
http://lists.freepascal.org/mailman/listinfo/fpc-devel
