Am 01.09.2011 17:48, schrieb Alexander Klenin: > [Is there any method to either comment on or re-open resolved isses? > It is very frustrating to be forced to switch comminication channel] > > I think this issue is resolved prematurely. > First, I do not see a reason why normal property can not be > implemented by static field. > Second, even is such a reason is provided, compiler should error out > instead of generating bogus code > (Optimal solution would be to issue a warning or hint and generate > correct code). > Either way, "no change required" is IMHO wrong resolution. >
Maybe you should reread Jonas' comment? Apparently something in trunk has been changed regarding this already. _______________________________________________ fpc-devel maillist - fpc-devel@lists.freepascal.org http://lists.freepascal.org/mailman/listinfo/fpc-devel
