On 10/11/2011 07:33 AM, Hans-Peter Diettrich wrote:
I'd use another type, e.g. LCLstring, which can be set independently from any other automatisms.
While using a "private" string type "just in case" or for flexibility in a work in progress, might be a good idea, the goal should be to everywhere use the dynamically encoded basic new string type and have the private type be an alias to same.
-Michael _______________________________________________ fpc-devel maillist - fpc-devel@lists.freepascal.org http://lists.freepascal.org/mailman/listinfo/fpc-devel
