On 10/11/2011 09:37 PM, Hans-Peter Diettrich wrote:
Obviously, the dedicated upper/lower translation done in a certain encoding is a lot faster than any re-encoding.Why implement the upper/lower translation N times, when afterwards the N encodings have to be converted into the Result encoding? Where the encoding conversions already exist...
-Michael _______________________________________________ fpc-devel maillist - [email protected] http://lists.freepascal.org/mailman/listinfo/fpc-devel
