On 28.01.2012 12:59, Hans-Peter Diettrich wrote:
Michael Van Canneyt schrieb:
Otherwise funny things will happen with duplicate identifiers.
I know. The problem will get only worse with nested type declarations,
which are next on my todo list.
One more problem introduced by uneducated Delphi developers. Must FPC
really follow all these aberrations, which only bind development
capacity, without any adequate improvement?
Only because YOU think they are aberrations this must not be the opinion
of others. Also they have proven rather useful in context of generics.
I wonder what a chaos will manifest, as soon as somebody tries to
implement the new Delphi (XE2) namespaces in FPC :-(
Ehm... AFAIK the only difference from XE2 namespaces to pre-XE2
namespaces is that you can select a default namespace (and pre-XE2
namespaces are already implemented in FPC).
Renaming the RTL units so that they use namespaces is a different topic
though and was not yet decided upon.
Regards,
Sven
_______________________________________________
fpc-devel maillist - [email protected]
http://lists.freepascal.org/mailman/listinfo/fpc-devel
