No, just reorder the fields so that they can be properly $IFDEFed as protected for nonLAZARUS and left (private) as is otherwise. Sure not every filed but those the non-mainstreams developers ask. This'll allow the non-mainstreams to start fixing right now. Florian, it's a huge headache for Martin Graeme to remember & explain all smallest details "what & when & why" and they can easily introduce bugs if fixing their code in a hurry. As they'll remember & fix their code to "without cracker" they'll be informing the FPC team to delete related $IFDEF so on.
2012/7/21, Florian Klämpfl <[email protected]>: > Am 21.07.2012 20:47, schrieb Ivanko B: >> I don't see cracker classes as valid code. >> ============= >> Then the FPC team should eliminate the need in such crackers - via >> either disabling (via licencing, prisoning etc) the "impatient" >> [mainly because of impatient customers] non-mainstreams (non-Lazarus) >> or meeting needs of the non-mainstreams ( the above "{$ifdef >> nonLazarus}" etc ). > > So you propose we should just remove all privat/protected directives? > > > _______________________________________________ > fpc-devel maillist - [email protected] > http://lists.freepascal.org/mailman/listinfo/fpc-devel > _______________________________________________ fpc-devel maillist - [email protected] http://lists.freepascal.org/mailman/listinfo/fpc-devel
