Mark Morgan Lloyd <[email protected]> hat am 5. September 2012
um 11:38 geschrieben:
> Referring to http://www.freepascal.org/develop.var is there a reason why
> the "Fixes to 2.6.x" section gives a URI for fixes_2_2 ?
>
> What's correct in this context- branches/fixes_2_6/ or
> branches/fixes_2_6_0/ ?

fixes_2_6

See compiler/version.pas


> I'm trying to find a 2.6.1 that will compile Lazarus 1.0. Yesterday's
> daily snapshot fails with

Yesterday a feature was backported to fpc. I updated lazarus. Todays snapshot
should work.


> Compiling intfgraphics.pas
> intfgraphics.pas(634,49) Error: Identifier not found "TTiffIDF"
>
> Is there a specific revision number that is known to be OK for this? I'm
> trying to do notes for somebody off-list, and there's a code-generation
> patch in 2.6.1 that's needed for SPARC.


Mattias
_______________________________________________
fpc-devel maillist  -  [email protected]
http://lists.freepascal.org/mailman/listinfo/fpc-devel

Reply via email to