Am 17.12.2012 10:36, schrieb Graeme Geldenhuys: > Hi, > > Any FPC developer willing to comment on the status of some of these > issues (that have been years overdue)?
It narrows basically down to the fact that fpc lacks developers and contributors, or do I miss something? > > -------- Original Message -------- > Subject: Re: [MSEide-MSEgui-talk] MSEide+MSEgui 2.8.4 > Date: Mon, 17 Dec 2012 08:57:15 +0100 > From: John Doe 1 <****> > To: mseide-msegui-t...@lists.sourceforge.net > > On Saturday 15 December 2012 18:19:24 John Doe 2 wrote: >> On 14/12/12 20:15, John Doe 1 wrote: >>> This probably is the last version which depends on FPC-FCL. >> >> I often feel like doing the same. Hell, sometimes even replacing the >> RTL. I already have a slimmed down SysUtils and Classes unit in a >> private branch. >> > > It seems to me, main target of FPC development today is compatibility to > the "modern" Delphi language constructs, I don't want to go this > route.And we need more flexibility, I can't fight days or weeks with > Michael and Marco for every little change which is not on Lazarus or > their own benefit.Ouh, and there still is no unicode support for > resource strings, no official statement how unicode will be implemented > in RTL, the compiler becomes slower and slower, smart linking MSEide on > 64 bit Linux is not possible with 2GB ram, still no Delphi-like packages... > Sad. > > John Doe 1 > > ------------------[ end ]------------------- > > > > > _______________________________________________ > fpc-devel maillist - fpc-devel@lists.freepascal.org > http://lists.freepascal.org/mailman/listinfo/fpc-devel > _______________________________________________ fpc-devel maillist - fpc-devel@lists.freepascal.org http://lists.freepascal.org/mailman/listinfo/fpc-devel