In our previous episode, Mark Morgan Lloyd said: > > interest to implement such a CPU... *cough* m68k *cough* ;) > > Agreed. But combinations that don't compile meaningfully (e.g. the > compiler targeting IA-64) or at all without at least backported patches > (various RTLs including MacOS Classic, Amiga etc.) could IMO usefully be > in compiler/attic and rtl/attic. In other words, anything in the main > directories should compile and run, and if somebody spots that that is > no longer the case then it's a candidate for being fixed. > > Obviously this is a personal opinion. I for one am not trying to hector, > badger, buffalo or otherwise irritate the coee team :-)
Doesn't that only inflate SVN backup sizes? Better have some textfile (in SVN for that matter) that explains a bit more. _______________________________________________ fpc-devel maillist - fpc-devel@lists.freepascal.org http://lists.freepascal.org/mailman/listinfo/fpc-devel