On 01/28/13 13:20, Michael Van Canneyt wrote: > > tatata, you should always understand everything :)
:-) > Since you can do the same with simple named methods too, > I see no need for creating the readibility horror that results of it. Yup. I have also seen sample Delphi code where they used Generics. It was on the Code of Horror website if I remember correctly. It was ridiculously complex, unreadable, and probably a nightmare to debug. I regard simplicity and readability very high in my code. It makes working in a team so much easier too. That is what the Pascal language was all about. >> I use avanced record syntax because it makes code more understandable. > > It offers nothing that objects didn't already have. Yeah, what was that all about... "advanced records". They are nothing more than the Objects introduced in Turbo Pascal days - and then Embarcadero has the audacity to call it a "new language feature". LOL. BTW: I still find it useful using Objects instead of Classes in some places in my code. Regards, - Graeme - _______________________________________________ fpc-devel maillist - fpc-devel@lists.freepascal.org http://lists.freepascal.org/mailman/listinfo/fpc-devel