Am 10.02.2013 11:09, schrieb Sven Barth:
Having a LLVM backend would not only benefit HedgeWar's JavaScript case, but also all others that would like to use the LLVM backend for one purpose or the other. And in my opinion a pure JS backend would be much harder to implement than a LLVM backend as one also needs to think about how certain things should be implemented in JS (which the emscripten developers already thought of).
Well, I doubt that this will work smoothless but since I don't care about js or llvm support I won't argue about it :)
_______________________________________________ fpc-devel maillist - fpc-devel@lists.freepascal.org http://lists.freepascal.org/mailman/listinfo/fpc-devel
