On Tue, Mar 5, 2013 at 11:46 AM, Paul Ishenin <paul.ishe...@gmail.com> wrote: > 05.03.13, 21:00, Marcos Douglas пишет: > >> So now we have 7! ;-) >> I want to keep the language sane too. > > > I wrote not about sane/insane. Delphi adds features to pascal the way they > want - this is reality. We can't do anything with this. If they add a > feature not the sane way we can't undo their feature. From that moment > language become so - with this feature. Whether we want or no. Sooner or > later we will have to deal with this feature exactly as Delphi developers > see it.
But if something isn't good enough, why spend time to codify this? > What I was against is to add the second implementation for already existent > language feature. Why follow the Delphi even knowing that is the wrong way to implement something? > But after mail of Michael I already look at this more tolerant now. So > please let's stop this endless dispute about nothing. We have different > vision and this is good after all. Ok. Best regards, Marcos Douglas _______________________________________________ fpc-devel maillist - fpc-devel@lists.freepascal.org http://lists.freepascal.org/mailman/listinfo/fpc-devel
