Sven Barth wrote:
Am 25.07.2013 12:10, schrieb Mark Morgan Lloyd:
Sven Barth wrote:
On 24.07.2013 16:36, Bernd Oppolzer wrote:
Then I built the RTL for linux, which also worked successfully, as far
as I saw,
but when compiling with -Tlinux, I now get the following message:
How did you build it? Building the RTL for Linux should be (assuming
that your FPC source is at c:\fpc)
cd c:\fpc
make crossall CPU_TARGET=i386 OS_TARGET=linux
CROSSBINDIR=C:\path\to\linux\binutils BINUTILSPREFIX=i386-linux-
BINUTILSPREFIX could also be something different or empty (then the
option should be "BINUTILSPREFIX="), it depends on how your
assembler/linker for Linux is prefixed.
Once that worked you can install the compiler using
make crossinstall CPU_TARGET=i386 OS_TARGET=linux
INSTALL_PREFIX=c:\wherever\fpc\should\be\installed
Is it possible to "ask" the makefile for the true names of the
supported targets?
Huh? What do you mean with "true names" and "supported targets"?
You're telling him that it's possible to build using ...CPU_TARGET=i386
OS_TARGET=linux but where do those come from? Without being told by a
developer or without referring to fully updated documentation, how does
somebody know to use "i386" rather than "x86", or whether it should be
"mips" or "mipseb"?
I can see that there's a MAKEFILETARGETS list in the makefile, which
obviously goes slightly further than I'm asking in that it shows the
valid combinations (i.e. somebody trying to build for powerpc + os2 is
severely out of luck). But something like a "targets" target would be
useful.
--
Mark Morgan Lloyd
markMLl .AT. telemetry.co .DOT. uk
[Opinions above are the author's, not those of his employers or colleagues]
_______________________________________________
fpc-devel maillist - [email protected]
http://lists.freepascal.org/mailman/listinfo/fpc-devel
