On Tue, January 14, 2014 15:38, Mark Morgan Lloyd wrote: > Hans-Peter Diettrich wrote: > >>> If the owner wants that not to happen,, choose any of these licenses >>> mentioned. >>> This is really important. Without huge legal fees I can't get my >>> intellectual property back.... >> >> Sorry, that's nonsense. You still have all rights on your own software, >> no need to get anything "back". Even in outdated Copyright terms a "use >> as you like" should not mean "take ownership". > > I don't think that's necessarily the case. If you don't make a clear > statement of ownership in every accessible file then it's difficult to > claim that it's not in the public domain (or "res nullius"), that's why > classic IBM operating systems and HP calculator firmware are now being > distributed freely.
Even if it is in the public domain, you don't need to do anything to be able to use it (you can use it as well as anybody else). On the other hand, if you want to keep the licence terms under your control, you indeed need to choose an appropriate licence first. Tomas _______________________________________________ fpc-devel maillist - fpc-devel@lists.freepascal.org http://lists.freepascal.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/fpc-devel
