As I already stated, those are the same arguments that I have heard 30 years ago when people ware asking me why I would use C instead of doing it like them in Assembler. later, why I would use C++ classes, when we has sructures in C++. Why use virtual methods, in C++ instead of using the EC++ without them to “save space”? ... I think history has at least so far always been on the side of my arguments ;-) .
With best regards, Boian Mitov ------------------------------------------------------- Mitov Software www.mitov.com ------------------------------------------------------- From: Michael Schnell Sent: Monday, September 22, 2014 5:09 AM To: FPC developers' list Subject: Re: [fpc-devel] Suggestion: reference counted objects On 09/22/2014 11:54 AM, Peter Popov wrote: > > Because you'll need to declare an interface for each class you want to > > have reference counted so that you can access its methods, properties, > > etc. > > > Con: more typing > Pro: you know what you are doing. I cannot agree more. Another con: Nobody will search for the term "interface" when he wants reference counting :-( -Michael -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- _______________________________________________ fpc-devel maillist - fpc-devel@lists.freepascal.org http://lists.freepascal.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/fpc-devel
_______________________________________________ fpc-devel maillist - fpc-devel@lists.freepascal.org http://lists.freepascal.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/fpc-devel
