As for 2. this is example where attribute could have helped ;-) . Just another
argument in favor of attributes vs. new keywords ;-) .
With best regards,
Boian Mitov
-------------------------------------------------------
Mitov Software
www.mitov.com
-------------------------------------------------------
From: hinsta...@yandex.ru
Sent: Monday, October 27, 2014 6:48 AM
To: FPC developers' list
Subject: Re: [fpc-devel] Proof of Concept ARC implementation
I tested it a bit; thoughts so far:
1. generic and refcounted do not work well together: no matter how I arrange
it, a class can't be both generic and refcounted, it causes the compiler to
produce some internal error 2014092205.
2. Lazarus CodeTools parser hates refcounted keyword, but can be fooled into
ignoring it with if-defs
27.10.2014, 16:15, "Sven Barth" <pascaldra...@googlemail.com>:
Am 27.10.2014 11:37 schrieb <hinsta...@yandex.ru>:
I think we should just roll out this feature to FPC trunk and let people
test it; so those who are interested in it would test it and detect potential
problems in practice rather than in thought experiments
Then just checkout the branch I mentioned in my initial mail. It's
implemented there and is not a thought experiment. I'm not going to commit this
any time soon to trunk, because 1) there are too many open points and 2) trunk
is preparing for release branching thus no new big features and especially not
as critized ones as this.
Regards,
Sven
,
_______________________________________________
fpc-devel maillist - fpc-devel@lists.freepascal.org
http://lists.freepascal.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/fpc-devel
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
_______________________________________________
fpc-devel maillist - fpc-devel@lists.freepascal.org
http://lists.freepascal.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/fpc-devel
_______________________________________________
fpc-devel maillist - fpc-devel@lists.freepascal.org
http://lists.freepascal.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/fpc-devel
