Thanks,
So do you think it is worth to extend documentation for inline? Or
perhaps the compiler could give a warning when code is not suitable for
inlining or is this decision done when a caller requests inlining and
not when the inline function gets compiled?
Michael
Am 06.04.15 um 18:59 schrieb Florian Klaempfl:
Am 06.04.2015 um 17:53 schrieb Michael Ring:
Take the following unit, my goal is to have the code called in the unit
inlined in the main code.
This works fine when
type
pLongWord = ^LongWord;
is defined in the interface of the unit.
if this is defined in Implementation then Inlining of the code does not
work.
Is this correct behaviour? Or should both ways work?
Inline is only a recommendation to the compiler. Such a definition in
the implementation part prevents indeed inlining.
In this particular case I recommend that you just leave the definition
away so compiler uses that one of the system unit.
_______________________________________________
fpc-devel maillist - fpc-devel@lists.freepascal.org
http://lists.freepascal.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/fpc-devel
_______________________________________________
fpc-devel maillist - fpc-devel@lists.freepascal.org
http://lists.freepascal.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/fpc-devel
