On 07.12.2015 20:00, Michael Van Canneyt wrote:
On Mon, 7 Dec 2015, Denis Kozlov wrote:
On 6 December 2015 at 08:29, Ondrej Pokorny <laza...@kluug.net> wrote:
If you don't persist in using SimpleIPC, there is also AdvancedIPC
that uses
the same approach (temporary files) across all targets and so it
behaves
consistently.
I think SimpleIPC and AdvancedIPC complement each other. SimpleIPC
uses native IPC mechanisms, while AdvancedIPC uses a generic (file
based) mechanism. Both have advantages and disadvantages, so it's
great to have both available.
+1
Interesting point! From this point-of-view I don't have to create the
connection layer between SimpleIPC and AdvancedIPC as me&you suggested
here:
http://lists.freepascal.org/pipermail/fpc-devel/2015-September/035958.html
It makes sense.
Ondrej
_______________________________________________
fpc-devel maillist - fpc-devel@lists.freepascal.org
http://lists.freepascal.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/fpc-devel
