On Thu, Jan 28, 2016 at 7:34 AM, Sven Barth <pascaldra...@googlemail.com> wrote: [...]
> The format of interface VMTs could also differ per platform so considering > that as more stable only holds true because of what we currently support. > Sorry for ask here, but, don't you recomment to use interfaces? I'm making a project and I'm planning to use some COM interfaces to make something a list adapter <http://developer.android.com/reference/android/widget/ListAdapter.html>. > The more stable approach would definitely be the one that does not rely on > implementation details, but only on the specified, documented language > behavior (bugs not withstanding of course), thus the approach I've > mentioned above. > > I consider the approach with manual interfaces as hackish. Period. > [...] What is manual interfaces, does it mean CORBA interfaces? I'm asking about using interfaces because I could easily change my project to use abstract classes, however I don't know if the interfaces choice can be a good choice. -- Silvio Clécio
_______________________________________________ fpc-devel maillist - fpc-devel@lists.freepascal.org http://lists.freepascal.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/fpc-devel
