just found some issues

Neither syntax works in constant evaluation.
Not sure if they should, so asking here (the 2nd syntax is operator like, so kind of expected it would)

both cause an internal error trying to take the address of the returned candidate. Then again this might not be a valid operation, but instead of internal error it should then give a more proper error.

program Project1;
{$mode objfpc}
const a = 1 + 2;
//const a = ifthen(true, 1,2);
//const a = if true then 1 else 2;
var b: integer;
var x : pointer;
begin
  //x :=  @( if false then b else b);  // internal error
  //x :=  @( ifthen( false , b , b));  // internal error
  writeln(a);
  writeln(ptrint(x));
  readln;
end.


Another internal error when using with the in operator.
program Project1;
{$mode objfpc}
var b: integer;
begin
  b := 1;
  writeln(b in [1,2] );
  //writeln(b in ifthen( true , [1,2] , [3.4])); // internal error
  //writeln(b in if true then [1,2] else [3.4]);  // internal error
  readln;
end.


And this compiles, but nothing get incremented.
If it should not work, then should it give an error?
(such as "variable identifier expected" which you get when you try to pass other not incrementable expressions )

program Project1;
{$mode objfpc}
var b: integer;
begin
  b := 0;
  writeln(b);
  inc( if true then b else b );
  writeln(b);
  inc( ifthen( true ,b ,b ));
  writeln(b);
  readln;
end.

same with readln
  readln( if true then b else b   );
  writeln(b);
  readln( ifthen( true ,b ,b ));
  writeln(b);

_______________________________________________
fpc-devel maillist  -  fpc-devel@lists.freepascal.org
http://lists.freepascal.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/fpc-devel

Reply via email to