On Wed, 27 Jul 2016, Jonas Maebe wrote:
Michael Van Canneyt wrote on Wed, 27 Jul 2016:
Why not introduce an address operator ?
operator @ (T : MyType) : Pointer;
It's only needed because Maciej wants the proxy type to behave differently
from all other existing types. The solution is not to add functionality to
make that easier, but to fix the inconsistencies.
Then I didn't understand what exactly you think is inconsistent ?
Knowing the purpose, what do you think can be done ?
Michael.
_______________________________________________
fpc-devel maillist - fpc-devel@lists.freepascal.org
http://lists.freepascal.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/fpc-devel
