On Thu, 28 Jul 2016, Dmitry Boyarintsev wrote:
On Thu, Jul 28, 2016 at 10:37 AM, Michael Van Canneyt <
mich...@freepascal.org> wrote:
[+] Default field (even if it is only syntactic sugar)
can-o'worms:
Wasn't there a discussion to have multiple default fields depending on the
type?
[-] Multiple default fields: definite nono, since this compromises type safety.
Michael.
_______________________________________________
fpc-devel maillist - fpc-devel@lists.freepascal.org
http://lists.freepascal.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/fpc-devel
