Am 14.07.2017 um 10:04 schrieb Marco van de Voort: > In our previous episode, Martok said: >> There is a fundamental difference in the type system between a somewhat >> sensible >> (if unexpected) assumption in FPC and a more practical documented definition >> in >> every other Pascal compiler. An assumption that even FPC follows only in this >> one single spot. >> This is unexpected and breaks unrelated code. That's the problem. > > Other pascal's don't have sparse enums ?
Wait, what do sparse enums have to do with any of that? But: yes, they do. _______________________________________________ fpc-devel maillist - fpc-devel@lists.freepascal.org http://lists.freepascal.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/fpc-devel
