Oh whoops. My mistake. On Tue 19/06/18 06:18 , Sven Barth via fpc-devel fpc-devel@lists.freepascal.org sent: > Am 19.06.2018 um 02:47 schrieb J. Gareth Moreton: > Technically it's a regression because it worked fine before and it > breaks now. However, I do agree... how should a string literal be > interpreted? Technically either a WideString or UnicodeString is correct, > so the compiler cannot decide between them or even know what the best fit > is. It's an overload between UnicodeString and WideCHAR, not WideString, so > there is a definitive difference. > > Regards, > Sven > __________________________________________ _____ > fpc-devel maillist - fpc- de...@lists.freepascal.org > http://lists.freepascal.org/cgi- bin/mailman/listinfo/fpc-devel [1] > > > > Links: > ------ > [1] > http://secureweb.fast.net.uk/parse.php? redirect=http://lists.freepascal.org > /cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/fpc-devel >
_______________________________________________ fpc-devel maillist - fpc-devel@lists.freepascal.org http://lists.freepascal.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/fpc-devel
