On Mon, November 5, 2018 18:02, wkitt...@windstream.net wrote: > On 11/4/18 10:31 PM, Ben Grasset wrote:
. . > for me, i'm done with this thread now ;) I'd appreciate if this part of the discussion related to importance of TP compatibility is finished for everybody. I understand that the original poster tried to suggest changing priorities. That may be a valid point, but I'd prefer discussing what should improve and how rather than whether the current state has good enough reasons. If prepared this way (e.g. 'I believe that the Features paragraph on the FPC homepage should be modified to: ..., because ...'), we may come to an agreement more efficiently than if discussing on purely theoretical level. Even then, it probably isn't a topic for the fpc-devel list but rather for fpc-pascal. In addition, I'd like to remind you that there's a category 'Website' in the bug tracker and that specific possible improvements may be posted there as well. Tomas (one of FPC mailing list moderators) _______________________________________________ fpc-devel maillist - fpc-devel@lists.freepascal.org http://lists.freepascal.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/fpc-devel
