> On Feb 24, 2019, at 10:48 AM, Jonas Maebe <[email protected]> wrote:
>
>
> It's is an inherent part of the "class" feature. Without it, any exception
> that gets thrown in a constructor (or in any code called by a constructor)
> will cause memory leaks.
Not very useful if we don’t use exceptions though. :) I still don’t understand
why exceptions aren’t enabled with a mode switch like advanced records or type
helpers especially considering everyone that uses classes is now paying a price
for it (without even knowing!).
>
>> (one of the reasons I don’t stress about feature bloat like in other
>> languages). I would suggest we make this a compilers switch that is on by
>> default but can be disabled.
>
> You can disable these exception frames with {$implicitexceptions off}. If you
> want to disable it for TObject, you have to recompile the system unit with
> that switch, since the code for TObject's c
How can I test to verify if this works or not? Martin makes it sound like
there’s some other considerations for subclasses.
Regards,
Ryan Joseph
_______________________________________________
fpc-devel maillist - [email protected]
http://lists.freepascal.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/fpc-devel
