Aah, thank you.
On 02/07/2019 19:56, Michael Van Canneyt wrote:
On Tue, 2 Jul 2019, J. Gareth Moreton wrote:
I don't recall a conversation where such an intrinsic is seen as
desirable, but if such a construct is desirable, then that's a good
thing since it will help patch up this problem.
As for the Delphi problem, it's second-hand information I heard from
a friend who uses Delphi at work and something about not handling
out-of-range enumerations was a deal-breaker from not using FPC. I
may have some details wrong though. But all that side, would
development of an intrinsic be an acceptable solution, and what name
are we going for? (One has to be careful we don't break existing code
if possible)
See this thread:
https://www.mail-archive.com/fpc-devel@lists.freepascal.org/msg35100.html
Michael.
_______________________________________________
fpc-devel maillist - fpc-devel@lists.freepascal.org
https://lists.freepascal.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/fpc-devel
---
This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software.
https://www.avast.com/antivirus
_______________________________________________
fpc-devel maillist - fpc-devel@lists.freepascal.org
https://lists.freepascal.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/fpc-devel
