Am 05.07.2019 um 11:28 schrieb Michael Van Canneyt: > But IMO such a strict stance is untenable: you cannot ensure correct values > in all cases even within the confines of the language (as demonstrated > before).
Correct. Even if certain (exactly two) people here believe differently. > So, in my book, an intrinsic to check for a correct value in the places where > an > invalid value can enter the system is a welcome language feature. In my book it's absolutely insane that this is needed *just because* FPC wants to be different, but yes, it is required. -- Regards, Martok Ceterum censeo b32079 esse sanandam. _______________________________________________ fpc-devel maillist - fpc-devel@lists.freepascal.org https://lists.freepascal.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/fpc-devel
