Re: [fpc-devel] I've asked this before, but perhaps I wasn't specific enough that time: what do I personally, specifically need to do to ensure that a native Windows 64-bit build winds up on the FPC website for the next release?

Mattias Gaertner via fpc-devel Wed, 12 Jan 2022 14:38:42 -0800

On Wed, 12 Jan 2022 23:20:34 +0100
Sven Barth via fpc-devel <fpc-devel@lists.freepascal.org> wrote:


>[..]
> When compiling from a target supporting Extended to one only
> supporting Double there isn't a loss of precision when calculating
> values at compile time. The other way around however, there *is* and
> that is the more crucial problem.

I'm curious, do other cross compilers like gcc
have similar problems? How do they solve it?

Mattias
_______________________________________________
fpc-devel maillist  -  fpc-devel@lists.freepascal.org
https://lists.freepascal.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/fpc-devel

Re: [fpc-devel] I've asked this before, but perhaps I wasn't specific enough that time: what do I *personally*, specifically need to do to ensure that a native Windows 64-bit build winds up on the FPC website for the next release?

Reply via email to

Re: [fpc-devel] I've asked this before, but perhaps I wasn't specific enough that time: what do I personally, specifically need to do to ensure that a native Windows 64-bit build winds up on the FPC website for the next release?