Confirmed wrong/bad asm code generation after the reported comment
https://gitlab.com/freepascal.org/fpc/source/-/issues/41422
On 30/09/2025 10:59, Martin Frb via fpc-devel wrote:
3.3.1 d3ac07ad274b6c6b09ff9b08a9d7007aaf780aa6
I am currently tracking an issue (either my code, or the peephole opt
/ or some opt+peephole).
While going through the asm I found:
# Register r10,r15,r15 allocated
Why is r15 twice in the list?
Is that supposed to happen? Or is that in itself an issue?
_______________________________________________
fpc-devel maillist - [email protected]
https://lists.freepascal.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/fpc-devel
