On 2026-04-07 15:58, Martin Frb via fpc-devel wrote:
On 07/04/2026 15:41, Martin Frb via fpc-devel wrote:
Anyway, if we reverse the order, then if I understand everything correctly  we would have the robo commits to advance the fpcbuild submodule link in the fpc/ repo ? No thanks!


Actually, I would think the relation between fpc src and build can be described as n to 1

Not really? Most changes in fpc-build don't depend on changes in fpc-src (at least not directly) and vice versa? However, you need to have both parts up to date when building (either a release, or a snapshot, or whatever - depending on the particular branch).


- For any commit in fpc-src there is one fpc build commit that works (others may, but one that should be used) - For any commit in fpc-build there are many commits in fpc-source that it can be used with/for.

It isn't just that it wouldn't build, but that you need clearly defined combination you can refer to (should it be because you want to test building and the point of the test is having a consistent state to which the test refers to, or because you want to be able to refer to a clearly defined point in time in the bugtracker, because there _are_ some cases in which one depends on the other).


But because the submodule in the current direction, allows to specify only one fpc-source commit as belonging to the fpc-build commit, you artificially keep creating commits, so you can link to all the other fpc-source commits.

And if you reverse the dependency, that should disappear. You only need the submodule update, when it is technically required.

No, because you loose the consistency then. You wouldn't test RC building, etc., against a clearly defined state, and you wouldn't know what people used when they report issues.


If the dependency order is swapped, and you commit to fpc source and it keeps building with the same fpc-build, then there is on submodule update needed.

Again, during the release (and their preparations), changes are performed in both (actually, all 3 including fpc-docs) repositories and you need to keep track of the latest (most up to date) state of both / all 3.

Tomas
_______________________________________________
fpc-devel maillist  -  [email protected]
https://lists.freepascal.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/fpc-devel

Reply via email to