> IMHO you should already be happy with the internal linker because you are > now able to create a smartlinked lazarus without requiring 1+ GB of > memory.
FPC and Lazarus are just testing alternatives. Comparing FPC performance of internal linker with Delphi's or with external LD, I found no reason use it on current environment. > Please stop asking for pathetic requirements. Especially for things where > you don't know where you are talking about and therefor without in-depth > analyses where things could be improved. Please define "patetic requirements"... I find this very inpropriate and quite insolting. Keep in mind that I'm not in FPC developer team nor I'm interested. Nor I have a time for code analysis, as already mentioned. Exceptioin that all people need to read 1000s lines of code is not realistic to wrote suggestions by your FPC team project vision. My goal is to use software which is suitable to produce working application on specifically used environment and from that naturaly comes suggestions may or my not be suitable for the project. Nobody force you or anyone else to accept it. I did expected here an academical answer, raised from any banal insoltings. _______________________________________________ fpc-pascal maillist - fpc-pascal@lists.freepascal.org http://lists.freepascal.org/mailman/listinfo/fpc-pascal