Vinzent Höfler wrote: > because we assume it's non-recursive, that was the whole point. So we > should *first* check the count and then may lock/unlock the mutex > accordingly.
Note that these two actions must be atomic. This is what the TryLock is for. Micha _______________________________________________ fpc-pascal maillist - fpc-pascal@lists.freepascal.org http://lists.freepascal.org/mailman/listinfo/fpc-pascal
