John Coppens wrote: > Just an extra note: delay(1) seems to delay 4.1 ms, so it _does_ seem to > be possible to do less than 8.3?
You wait till the next tick that is after the requested delay. So it's never a HZ multiple or so. Micha _______________________________________________ fpc-pascal maillist - fpc-pascal@lists.freepascal.org http://lists.freepascal.org/mailman/listinfo/fpc-pascal
