Marco van de Voort wrote:
On Wed, 26 Mar 2008, Graeme Geldenhuys wrote:
On 26/03/2008, Michael Van Canneyt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Yes, use fully qualified names.
windows.tcriticalsection.
syncobjs.tcriticalsection.
Why doesn't Delphi compiler complain about it? A quick search
revealed that Delphi's Windows.pas unit doesn't contain a
TCriticalSection type definition, so why does FPC's Windows.pas unit?
Why must FPC have two TCriticalSection type definitions?
It was translated automatically with the h2pas tool, probably with the -t
option, which prepends a T to all types. For backwards compatibility we
cannot revert this.
Hmm, didn't older (<6) versions simply have this, and did synobjs get
introduced later? In that case, if Delphi can break compat, so can we.
D5 has Windows.TRTLCriticalSection, and SyncObjs.TCriticalSection which
encapsulates a TRLTCriticalSection.
--
Joao Morais
_______________________________________________
fpc-pascal maillist - fpc-pascal@lists.freepascal.org
http://lists.freepascal.org/mailman/listinfo/fpc-pascal
