Luca Olivetti schrieb:
[Beware, I'm neither an arm expert nor an fpc internals one, that's why
I'm asking instead of patching, patching that I wouldn't know how to do
anyway].
Due to my (insofar) failed experiment to get an arm-eabi compiler, I
took a look at where FPC_ARMEL is used.
FPC_ARMEL is apparently only used in compiler/systems/i_linux.pas and
compiler/systems/t_linux.pas.
The latter is the recent change to use the correct dynamic linker, and
the former to change the alignment of some structures (required by the
eabi specification).
Indeed, i_linux sets e.g. the calling conventions to eabi and this is
what the compiler/rtl check further one.
But eabi shouldn't also use a different syscall conversion[*]? Or does
it use libc with whatever calling convention it is using (though it
doesn't seem the case)?
[*]I think it can use the "old" one, albeit with some performance
penalization
Bye
_______________________________________________
fpc-pascal maillist - fpc-pascal@lists.freepascal.org
http://lists.freepascal.org/mailman/listinfo/fpc-pascal
