On Mon, 30 Jun 2008 10:03:18 -0300 "Felipe Monteiro de Carvalho" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Mon, Jun 30, 2008 at 9:55 AM, Graeme Geldenhuys > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > I thought UTF-8 was prefered. Hence the reason Lazarus followed the > > UTF-8 route in LCL and Unicode support. > > UTF-8 is much better for the LCL because it just fits much better in > out existing codebase. This may have been discussed before - but should the encoding not be dependent on the locale? What would happen if I write a FPC program, if the internal routines are, eg., UTF-16, and my locale is set to en_US.UTF8? Anyway, I have the impression that most of Linux is utf-8 oriented by now. John _______________________________________________ fpc-pascal maillist - fpc-pascal@lists.freepascal.org http://lists.freepascal.org/mailman/listinfo/fpc-pascal
