Mattias Gaertner wrote:
On Fri, 28 Nov 2008 15:45:08 +0100
"Vinzent Höfler" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Von: "Mattias Gärtner" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
I'm curious: who needs more than 13 different image interpolations?
13 different users, of course. ;)
That was a rhetorical question, wasn't it?
Not completely. ;)
I don't doubt the need of 13 different interpolations. I know most of
the interpolations from other graphical/mathematical applications.
But I doubt the need for 13 different *image* interpolations.
My question is if they exist in fpimage only, because they were
easy to implement, or are they all that different that you need
them?
I think speed vs. quality if you have multiple steps.
While playing with aggpas, I found that the image1 example gives a nice
idea about the differences:
http://aggpas.org/aggpas-demo.htm
Marc
_______________________________________________
fpc-pascal maillist - fpc-pascal@lists.freepascal.org
http://lists.freepascal.org/mailman/listinfo/fpc-pascal
