In our previous episode, leledumbo said: > The latter one has iteration overheads, while the former can be optimized to > loop as many as needed. I'm not saying I'm the best Pascal programmer, but > in case there's a (better) solution to this (rather than extending the > language) please tell me.
Your assesment is correct as far as I can see. However IMHO that doesn't meant you are right. One single case of an optimalization advantage, and then in a border case like iteration over a constant set does not justify a language extension. _______________________________________________ fpc-pascal maillist - fpc-pascal@lists.freepascal.org http://lists.freepascal.org/mailman/listinfo/fpc-pascal
