On 27 Jan 2009, at 11:30, Mattias Gärtner wrote:
Zitat von Jonas Maebe <jonas.ma...@elis.ugent.be>:
I've used qprof successfully in the past (not for FPC programs, but
for other things). It's a sampling-based profiler, so it shouldn't
slow down things too much.
Yes, that's why I prefer gprof and used it a lot in the past.
Note that I was talking about qprof (http://www.hpl.hp.com/research/linux/qprof/
), not gprof. As opposed to qprof (and Shark on Mac OS X), gprof is
not a sampling-based profiler (gprof traces the entire execution).
Jonas_______________________________________________
fpc-pascal maillist - fpc-pascal@lists.freepascal.org
http://lists.freepascal.org/mailman/listinfo/fpc-pascal
