BTW, the expression "@DynamicArray" should really return the address of the first element, not the address of the pointer to the array structure. It somehow destroys the abstraction. And I can't imagine any situation where the pointer might be of the interest for the user of the abstraction.
Yes, that's totaly "C-spirit": Don't follow any logic, the user can find out with trial-and-error.
_______________________________________________ fpc-pascal maillist - fpc-pascal@lists.freepascal.org http://lists.freepascal.org/mailman/listinfo/fpc-pascal
