Juha Manninen schrieb: >> This is plainly wrong. When indexing a dyn. array, the compiler >> generates the correct code to access the data, no more no less. > > It would be possible to allow this syntax : > move(data ... > in addition to the current : > move(data[0] ... > > There is no fundamental reason why it wouldn't be possible.
There is: there is no reason why move should be handled differently than other procedures. > The compiler would > generate the correct code as you mentioned. > Every newbie is struggling with this syntax. I remember struggling with it > myself. It is not intuitive at all. If you mess with move and have no clue about internals, then you get burned. Period. Proper dyn. array code uses copy(...) instead of move. _______________________________________________ fpc-pascal maillist - fpc-pascal@lists.freepascal.org http://lists.freepascal.org/mailman/listinfo/fpc-pascal
