Am Freitag, 18. Juni 2010 04:13 schrieb Bee Jay: > On 18 Jun 2010, at 02:58, Burkhard Carstens wrote: > > What about ExtJS being GPL licensed? Got a developer license? > > Yes, if you make commercial apps.
:-( > > Here you refere to the ExtJS components of fpweb, right? IOW. if > > those are (or will be) universal, they should get renamed? (see, > > you are in that stuff, so for you, all this is clear. for a newbie > > (at least for me), it's still all confusing .. so having clear and > > distinct names would help.. e.g. if it's about the fpWeb components > > for use with ExtJS JavaScript Framework, they should be called > > fpExtJS components ..) > > fpWeb is general purpose framework. You may use it with any JS > frameworks out there. Michael had made an example how to use it with > ExtJS. So, fpWeb is already an apropriate name, IMO. Sure, fpWeb is fine. What I mean: 1) clear distinction between a. "ExtJS Component" : a component of the ExtJS framework written in JavaScript. b. "fpExtJS Component" : a component of fpWeb written in pascal, designed to deal with an ExtJS component. It's just a documentation/communication issue: "..ExtJS components can be modified to support jquerygrid.." vs. "..fpExtJS components can be modified to support jquerygrid.." 2) *if* fpExtJS components get modified to also support jquerygrid, they should be renamed to fpUniJS component (or so). A well choosen name, which reflects the functionality, relationship and restriction of a component saves half a page of documentation and makes it easier for a newbie to get an overview. regards Burkhard _______________________________________________ fpc-pascal maillist - fpc-pascal@lists.freepascal.org http://lists.freepascal.org/mailman/listinfo/fpc-pascal
