OBones wrote on Wed, 22 Aug 2012:

Jonas Maebe wrote:

You can try debugging syswin32_i386_exception_handler in rtl/win32/system.pp to see what exception Win32 reports instead.
Thanks for the confirmation as I was heading that way when I posted the message, without much hope. But now that I have put that idea to full length, it became clear that the problem is not (entirely) with Win32 but because the exception handler does not handle the STATUS_FLOAT_MULTIPLE_FAULTS and STATUS_FLOAT_MULTIPLE_TRAPS cases.

I guess you mean "a division by zero using an SSE instruction results in STATUS_FLOAT_MULTIPLE_FAULTS and/or STATUS_FLOAT_MULTIPLE_TRAPS"?

And as you said, when it does not know what to do, it gives 217 that gets later translated to Control C, which to me is a bit misleading. I'd rather have a 202, External Exception.

202 is "stack overflow". 217 is also used in the RTL as "unhandled exception". I don't know how come that this code is used both for ctrl-c and unhandled exception. Probably a simple error from a long time ago that never got corrected.

So right, now, using this I'm getting the appropriate exception, I'm just left wondering if this code (or a similar one) should be added to FreePascal so that other people are not having the same issue as I'm having.

Probably. At least a quick web search seems to indicate this is a fairly well-known problem with SSE exceptions and Win32.


Jonas
_______________________________________________
fpc-pascal maillist  -  fpc-pascal@lists.freepascal.org
http://lists.freepascal.org/mailman/listinfo/fpc-pascal

Reply via email to